Plain-language desk AI for the Dummies

Ask what was measured before you repeat it.

Method

How to read an AI claim

Explainer · Updated 7 September 2026

AI marketing is fluent for the same reason the models are fluent: it is cheap to produce a finished-looking sentence. Before you repeat a number — “beats doctors,” “#1 on the leaderboard,” “cuts costs in half” — ask what object was measured, on what data, against what alternative, and who paid for the test.

This desk will not fill in a missing score. If a press release omits the dataset, the date, or the comparison system, we will not invent them. We also will not paste third-party leaderboard tables into these pages. Leaderboards change; they are not a substitute for a named evaluation card.

Five questions that usually suffice

  1. Model or product? A score on a raw model is not a score on the consumer app with tools and filters. See models versus products.
  2. What task? “Reasoning” and “intelligence” are slogans until someone names a test: multiple-choice questions, coding puzzles, translation pairs, a human preference vote. Different tasks disagree.
  3. What data? If the test items leaked into training, the number is closer to memorization than to skill. If the data is private, you cannot reproduce the claim.
  4. Compared with what? Beating last year’s own model is not the same as beating a competent person, a search engine, or a cheaper model. “Human-level” needs a definition of the human and the time allowed.
  5. Who ran it, and can you read the method? A vendor blog is a claim. A paper with prompts, seeds, and error bars is still a claim, but it is a claim you can argue with.

Demos are advertisements

A video can be real and still be selected. Cherry-picked prompts, hidden retries, and off-camera tools are ordinary. A live demo that works once is evidence that a path exists, not that the path is reliable. Treat demos the way you treat a car commercial: interesting, not a fuel-economy test.

Anecdotes are not rates

“It wrote my brief” and “it invented a case” can both be true. They do not tell you how often either happens on your workload. For everyday harms that do not need a leaderboard, see risks without hype. For the difference between training-time learning and a single answer, see training and inference.

What to do instead of collecting scores

If you must choose a tool, run a small, boring test on work you already know: a handful of real emails, a real spreadsheet, a real policy question. Write down what “good” means before you look. Keep the cases. That notebook will outlast this month’s chart. This site will not publish a fake one on your behalf.